Deprecated: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in /home/avocatbr/www/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/common.php on line 4181
Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the rocket domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/avocatbr/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131
Warning: session_cache_limiter(): Cannot change cache limiter when headers already sent in /home/avocatbr/www/wp-content/plugins/social-auto-poster/social-auto-poster.php on line 466
Warning: session_start(): Cannot start session when headers already sent in /home/avocatbr/www/wp-content/plugins/social-auto-poster/social-auto-poster.php on line 467
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/avocatbr/www/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/common.php:4181) in /home/avocatbr/www/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1902
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/avocatbr/www/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/common.php:4181) in /home/avocatbr/www/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1902
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/avocatbr/www/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/common.php:4181) in /home/avocatbr/www/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1902
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/avocatbr/www/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/common.php:4181) in /home/avocatbr/www/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1902
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/avocatbr/www/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/common.php:4181) in /home/avocatbr/www/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1902
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/avocatbr/www/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/common.php:4181) in /home/avocatbr/www/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1902
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/avocatbr/www/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/common.php:4181) in /home/avocatbr/www/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1902
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/avocatbr/www/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/common.php:4181) in /home/avocatbr/www/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1902
{"id":1394,"date":"2012-08-05T10:20:56","date_gmt":"2012-08-05T10:20:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/divorce.avocat-broquet.fr\/?p=1394"},"modified":"2018-12-11T21:46:43","modified_gmt":"2018-12-11T20:46:43","slug":"dommages-interets-dus-par-un-epoux-pour-fautes-de-gestion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/avocat-broquet.fr\/divorce\/actualite\/liquidation-de-la-communaute-actualite\/dommages-interets-dus-par-un-epoux-pour-fautes-de-gestion\/","title":{"rendered":"Dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats dus par un \u00e9poux pour fautes de gestion"},"content":{"rendered":"
Les dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eat dus par un \u00e9poux pour fautes de gestion pendant le mariage le sont \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9gard de la communaut\u00e9 et non de l\u2019autre conjoint. Ils font donc \u00e9galement partie du partage dans le cadre de la liquidation de la communaut\u00e9.<\/strong><\/p>\n
M. X. et Mme Y., \u00e9poux communs en biens, ont solidairement souscrit un emprunt aupr\u00e8s d’une premi\u00e8re banque pour financer l’acquisition d’un fonds de commerce exploit\u00e9 par le mari. Ils ont \u00e9galement acquis, six ans plus tard, une maison d’habitation au moyen d’un emprunt contract\u00e9 aupr\u00e8s d’une seconde banque. En 1992, M. X. a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 la suppression de son activit\u00e9 depuis 1987. Les \u00e9ch\u00e9ances de l’emprunt souscrit aupr\u00e8s de la premi\u00e8re banque n’ayant pas \u00e9t\u00e9 pay\u00e9es, celle-ci a fait inscrire une hypoth\u00e8que judiciaire d\u00e9finitive sur la maison d’habitation. Le divorce des \u00e9poux a \u00e9t\u00e9 prononc\u00e9, un proc\u00e8s-verbal de difficult\u00e9s constatant leur d\u00e9saccord quant \u00e0 la liquidation et au partage de leur communaut\u00e9. La premi\u00e8re banque ayant introduit une proc\u00e9dure de saisie-immobili\u00e8re, Mme Y. a assign\u00e9 son ex-\u00e9poux en paiement, soutenant qu\u2019il avait commis une faute de gestion en s’abstenant de d\u00e9clarer l’\u00e9tat de cessation des paiements d\u00e8s 1987, pr\u00e9tendant qu’il avait laiss\u00e9 ainsi s’accro\u00eetre la dette souscrite aupr\u00e8s de la banque, alors que le d\u00e9p\u00f4t de bilan \u00e0 cette date aurait entra\u00een\u00e9 la cl\u00f4ture de la proc\u00e9dure collective pour insuffisance d’actif et, en cons\u00e9quence, l’effacement de la cr\u00e9ance de la banque.<\/p>\n
Dans un arr\u00eat du 10 d\u00e9cembre 2009, la cour d’appel de Rouen a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 Mme X. de ses demandes.<\/p>\n